Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monira Qais

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as G7. Geschichte (talk) 21:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Monira Qais

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable author, academic. I googled in Bangla and English but didn't find any significant coverage that addresses the topic directly and in detail (fails WP:SIGCOV). The person didn't won any major award or anything similar. Fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:PROF. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No SIGCOV found. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:25, 27 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Comment The article has been moved by the creator back to draft space, see Draft:Monira Qais. Isabelle ^🔔 23:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved it back and posted a note to the editor. That's the simplest thing to do. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:40, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If not kept, Draftify as requested (in practice) by the creating editor. No-one else has added substantial content (others have removed "eminent", tweaked capitalisation etc, added categories). Allow the creating editor to work on the article further, outside mainspace. I can't evaluate the existing sources to see whether or not they support notability. PamD 12:30, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: creating editor has apparent COI (subject appears to be their mother) and has repeatedly had the article declined in draft (see previous version of talk page). PamD 12:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.